Everyone
may perceive this as an era of "total war" between Islam and the West,
an era of fierce conflict, fueled by hatred and reciprocal cycles of
violence. This
is certainly the vision of the Crusades, used to promote the idea of
an inevitable clash of civilizations between Europe and the Muslim
world. But is this really a concept for the era of the Crusades, if you scrutinize?
This
was not a friendly era agreements easiest and harmony, but seeing
prevailing realities of the world in general, should not be a surprise. West
itself in the Middle Ages was fraught with rivalries between Christians
and endless wars, social and religious intolerance was also growing
everywhere. According
to these standards, blending contacts and continuing conflicts in
eastern Mediterranean during the Crusades was not so great. In
an analysis of balances, tells the story of the Crusades is not at all
that Islam and the West were then destined to go to a "clash of
civilizations"
Powerful
images and immediate memory associated with the medieval Crusades were
dominated by war and violence: the first messengers of the Crusades who
walked on the blood of Muslims knee on July 15, 1099, after the barbaric
killings of the capture of Jerusalem ;
crusade army 88 years later in the battlefield of Hattin, in the wake
of a terrible loss at the hands of the greatest hero of Islam, Saladin,
and Baibari, Sultan of the Mamluks of Egypt relentless, which closed
doors in Antioch kryqëzatorit May 19, 1268, before being slaughtered in their thousands.
In
this background, anyone can perceive this as an era of "total war"
between Islam and the West, an era of fierce conflict, fueled by hatred
and reciprocal cycles of violence. This
is certainly the vision of the Crusades, used to promote the idea of
an inevitable clash of civilizations between Europe and the Muslim
world. But is this really a concept for the era of the Crusades, if you scrutinize?
Death
of the Prophet Muhammad in 632 was followed by a wave of Islamic
expansion furious, as Arab tribes poured out of the Arabian peninsula
and drew Palestine (including Jerusalem), Syria, Iraq, Iran and Egypt
with an unusual speed. In
the century that followed, the pace of expansion slowed somewhat, but
he nevertheless continued as among eighth century Muslim world stretched
from the Indus River and the borders of China in the east, along the
northern Africa to Spain and southern France in the west.
Already in 1000 the Muslims living in border communities in Western Europe, the best known in the Iber and Sicily. Those
looking to find evidence of contacts constructive and not destructive
in medieval Islam appointments with the Christian West, usually come
from these two border areas. There reveal abundant evidence for intercultural exchanges, broadcasting intellectuals and artistic fusion.
In
contrast, the history of the Crusades often accepted as unidimensional
as driven only by holy war and jihad Christians and Muslims. In
fact, such an approach greatly underestimates the complexity and colors
of war for the Holy Land began with the First Crusade in 1095 and ended
with the collapse of states built by the Crusaders in 1291.
The land beyond the sea
After
the first crusade, was created four countries - isolated outposts
Christians that lasted almost two centuries and was recognized as
OUTREMER (land across the sea). Impressive
history of those four settlements certainly reveals a constant battle
against the Muslims mbijtesë eastern Mediterranean.
But
history OUTREMER provides numerous examples of relations between
Christians and Muslims, in a way that throws up the idea that this was a
world of perpetual conflict. States
raised from the Crusades were rapidly assimilated by local customs and
all parties began to show a pragmatic desire to make a bargain, even
alliances with those who were supposed to be their enemies when
necessary.
So
in 1108, less than a decade after the brutal Jerusalem from the
Crusades, Latinos and Muslims fought alongside Antioch neighboring city
of Aleppo against a common enemy, in this moment, a second unusual
coalition, consisting of strength Christian rivals set by the state of the Crusades, of Edessa, and Iraqis from Mosul.
Some contacts were at a more personal level. Antioken
nobleman Robert Fitz Fulk, developed a close friendship with Turkish
fighter Tughteini of Damascus in the early 12th century. Desecrate it helped cement a short-lived alliance between their two cities in 1115. But until 1119, the two were very cool with each other.
When Robert was arrested and brought to Damascus that year, he may have hoped that would be left free. In
fact, when he refused to renounce his Christian faith, anger and
Tughteinin grabbed Robert's head cut off "by hurling a sword". Later he said he had washed Tughteini gold skull old friend.
In
the remainder of the twelfth century and beyond, Muslims and Christians
from the West often appeared willing to negotiate temporary agreement
that would be beneficial to both parties. Even
Saladin, who took power in Syria in 1174 with the promise it would hold
jihad and denouncing other Muslims constantly making deals with the
Latins, Comte secretly made an agreement with Tripoli in 1176. Sultan continued to demonstrate the same flexible approach to diplomatic contacts for the rest of his career.
Great care must be made when evaluating the significance of these examples of negotiations, arrangements or alliances. They do not represent an attempt to make lasting peace between Islam and the West. They were more exercises to achieve maximum convenience. In
the Middle Ages, diplomacy was usually a tool for conflict, which used
to reach advantages, or a temporary reprieve during which had regained
strength to resume hostilities. However,
it is striking to observe that, even in the context of a war of
religiously charged by the domination of the Holy Land, the persistence
of a "total war" proved impossible, and perhaps undesirable.
Throughout
the first half of the 13th century, the descendants of Saladin were
more willing to make deals with countries created by the Crusades. It
seems that their goal was to maintain a delicate balance of powers in
the East, so that trade agreements between East and West empowered. In
fact, the era of the Crusades not only resulted in a glut of trade
between sworn enemies, but there was even an almost exponential growth
in the size and scope of trade contacts between Islam and Latin Europe.
Italian
merchants from Venice, Pisa and Genoa played a role in this process,
creating enclaves in major ports of the States of the Crusades, as well
as in coastal cities, while created a complex network of trade routes
transmesdhetare.
These
pulsating artery of trade, connecting the east and close to the West,
East and products enabled valuables from the Middle East and Asia to
reach the European markets.
The transfer of goods from the Muslim world in the Mediterranean ports was very important not only for Christians. It
became one of the key elements of near eastern economy as a whole, life
for Muslim traders establish trade routes for caravans eastward; very
important for income Islam's great cities, Aleppo and Damascus. These
common interests and interdependence produced stirred carefully curated
contacts, even in times when political and military conflicts were at
their peak. In the end - even among holy war - trade was too important to cut.
And Iberian Muslim pilgrim traveler Ibn Jubayr was a living witness of this phenomenon. During
a trip in early 1180 that he began in North Africa, Arabia, Iraq and
Syria, he passed through the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem, with a caravan
of Muslim merchants from Damascus, visiting Akre and tire prior to
boarding the ship to Sicily .
He
described the structured systems to ensure the free flow of commercial
traffic, strict safety regulations, customs more efficient, including a
Akká where customs officers were hired to speak Arabic as holding
registers, as well as two-storey warehouses for storing Akká goods. Business between Christians and Muslims carried out "with citizens and respect and with no injustice".
Until
the 13th century, with the encouragement of Ayybid, Akká had become the
most important port of entry in the Mediterranean - the Levant
warehouses in which goods coming from all countries of the Crusades, the
near east and beyond. They magazinoheshin there before they left the ship to the west. Meanwhile, the traffic sent from west to east.
It
became increasingly common for traders to travel to Latin Muslim
territories, by trading woolen goods and saffron (the only western spice
found in East market) in Damascus, before returning to the acre of a
new shipment of silk and precious stones and semi precious stones.
Not all were impressed by the rapid pace of life in the Mediterranean port. A
Latin bishop called "a second Babylon," calling Akká "a city filled
with awesome ... indecent acts and evil deeds", with a population that
was "dedicated to all the senses of the body" - said Prostitution has flourished so much that even the clergy gave it their rented rooms prostitutes.
Condemnatory
tone of these comments was at least partly a response to Aker status as
a "meeting place" culture: a meeting place between Islam and the West,
where Latinos can be exposed and met with the habits of native states.
The
debate is still open how many residents of states embraced crusades
lifestyle and practices of people in the eastern Mediterranean. A
veteran of the First Crusade certainly suggested that there was an
element of customization when he wrote in 1120 "that God had transformed
the West in the East. For us Westerners had been already turned east we were. " However, credible evidence of assimilation are very rare.
Perhaps
the most remarkable source of information in this regard is Osama bin
Munqidh 'and his book "Book of Contemplation", a collection of tales and
anecdotes. Born
in 1095 - the same year when the Crusades began - Osama was a noble
Syrian Arab who had enjoyed a long career enormously diverse as the
warrior, diplomat and advisor. As such, he was the right person to witness the Crusades.
Myslimanëve.Për
entertainment orientalize issue of Latinos, Osama wrote: "There are
some who are accustomed to Western and Muslim societies attending. These
are better than those who have just arrived from their countries, but
these are the exception and can not be considered as typical cases ". Later,
he mentions the story of a knight in Antioch Latino elderly, who
already use the kitchen just east had employed "Egyptian cook" amuse and
delight guests with Muslims. This
approach to near eastern food is also due to the spread between Latinos
of different local foods - from citrus and pomegranates, to rice and
lentils.
Elsewhere,
Osama bin Munqidh described how he had visited a bath in Tyre, open to
Latino and Muslim, and the fact that he had heard of a bath run by
Muslims to take. The
latter directed by a named Selim, who had a history recounted Usamas
(which he considered egregious) for a frank rider who had visited his
premises. Knight
had decided that, as the Aegis depilohej hooked and was so pleased,
that he had called his wife: She fell, and jockey said: "Do it like you
did on me!" So, I depilova and his wife, while the rider sat on saw. Later, he thanked me and thanked me for my service. " Osama
then reflect on the great contradiction that drive this anecdote, that
Westerners "have no sense of ownership or honor, yet they have a lot of
great courage."
Interest Osama was almost always to the strangest and unusual, so his material should be viewed with caution. However,
his work often offers impressive views of daily life in the states
shows that the Crusades and the newcomers did not live in a seal the
culture, but they were committed to a mass adoption and assimilation. During
the war for the Holy Land, and timeliness pragmatic political reality,
military and commercial arrivals meant that the Crusades would have
frequent contact with the natives of the countries of birth, including
Muslims. Thus,
the Crusades created a border of environments where Europeans were able
to interact with and absorb eastern eastern culture.
Although
characterized by a religious war for territories holy crusades were not
held as "total war" and led to the meeting point between Christians and
Muslims, not very different from those observed in Sicily and Iber.
This
was not a friendly era agreements easiest and harmony, but seeing
prevailing realities of the world in general, should not be a surprise. West
itself in the Middle Ages was fraught with rivalries between Christians
and endless wars, social and religious intolerance was also growing
everywhere. According
to these standards, blending contacts and continuing conflicts in
eastern Mediterranean during the Crusades was not so great. In
an analysis of balances, tells the story of the Crusades is not at all
that Islam and the West were then destined to go to a "clash of
civilizations".
Monday, May 6, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment